![]() A 200mm post on the size large would prevent this, and it's something that taller or longer-legged riders should keep in mind.Īt the end of the day, the Norco Fluid has great suspension, good brakes, and a solid, workhorse drivetrain. It wasn't the amount of drop that was an issue, it was the fact that the very short seat tube meant I was running the post at the minimum insertion mark. The second component quibble has to do with the 170mm dropper post. A chainguide would be the first upgrade I'd make – we dropped the chain a handful of times, something a small upper guide would have prevented. It did very, very well against those carbon contenders, although there were a couple things that could be improved. Those bikes were more responsive in rolling terrain, with more of a platform to push against and generate speed.ĭoes the Fluid need $7,000 worth of upgrades to match the performance of those much more expensive competitors? Definitely not. It's not that it's sluggish, it's just that it doesn't have the same level of get-up-and-go as the Fuel EX, or the Santa Cruz Hightower. I ended up putting down my 4th fastest time on the Fluid, just one second slower than my 2nd and 3rd place times, and two seconds slower than my fastest time, which was on the Trek Fuel EX.Īs far as the overall handling goes, the Fluid has a solid, ready-for-anything feel, although its manners fall more on the neutral side of the spectrum rather than being a zippy, lively thing. Still, Norco has cooked up a tasty recipe with the Fluid, especially when it comes to tackling steep terrain. ![]() As always, a bike is the sum of its geometry numbers, and looking at one in isolation doesn't tell the whole story. For comparison, the Fluid has a 135mm head tube, and the Yeti SB140's measures 100mm even with a 160mm fork the Yeti still has a lower stack height than the Fluid. The Fluid has a fairly long head tube, which increases the stack height and makes it easier to stay centered while descending, instead of feeling like you're getting pulled over the front end. ![]() On the Optic, the shock tune felt like it prioritized support over everything else, while the Float X on the Fluid offers better small bump compliance, along with those extra five millimeters of travel to further take the edge off bigger hits. The geometry numbers aren't worlds apart from the 125mm Optic that impressed us back in 2020, but there is a noticeable difference in how the two bikes ride. This is one of those bikes that doesn't shy away from the occasional sketchy move (or three) despite having the least amount of front and rear travel in this test. The term 'aggressive trail bike' still seems a little strange to me – why is it so angry? – even though it really is the best way to categorize the Fluid. Interestingly, the Fluid ended up placing second in the efficiency test, so it's no slouch when the stopwatch and power pedals are out. It's still calm enough to run it fully open for any non-road riding, though, with a good amount of grip to help it keep clambering its way upward. The Float X shock did dip into its travel more eagerly than the Santa Cruz Hightower or the Trek Fuel EX, which meant I'd occasionally flip the climb switch for longer fireroad climbs. Of course, the Scott has 150mm of rear travel and a 64-degree head angle, so it's not exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, and at the end of the day both bikes will get up just about anything without much fuss. The Fluid's handling is fairly neutral, especially for a bike in this category, but it was slightly easier to zig and zag through tight climbs compared to the longer and slacker Scott Genius. The tall headtube creates a cockpit position that's nice and upright, even with the 140mm fork – there aren't any hunched over, stretched out XC shenanigans going on here. Riders who are used to pedaling around longer travel enduro bikes will instantly feel at home with the Norco's seated position. ![]() Otherwise I didn't think twice about it, usually because I was trying not to fall off whatever weird skinny log ride I'd discovered in the woods of Whistler. Yes, if I hopped off the 30-pound Scott and right onto the Norco I could notice the little bit of extra heft while climbing, but it was really only in those direct comparisons that it was apparent. SDG Tellis Dropper, 34.The Norco's weight never really entered my mind when climbing or descending. RockShox Recon Silver RL, 140mm Travel, 42mm OffsetįSA Comet 1X DM, 30T, 170mm (S), 175mm (M - XXL) The Fluid FS A4's 130mm travel is precision engineered, pairing custom tuned suspension components with 140mm fork travel and boutique level fit & finish for maximum Trail performance & potential. ![]() Get everything out of the trail that you put into it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |